<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.2 20190208//EN"
                  "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="1.2" article-type="other">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id></journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Journal for Reproducibility in
Neuroscience</journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn publication-format="electronic">2670-3815</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Publishers of Trial and Error</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<title-group>
<article-title>How research reproducibility challenges librarians’ skill
sets. A French librarian’s perspective</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Granger</surname>
<given-names>Sabrina</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-0"/>
</contrib>
<aff id="aff-0">
<institution-wrap>
<institution>École nationale supérieure des sciences de l’information et
des bibliothèques (National School of Information and Library Sciences,
ENSSIB). 17 Boulevard du 11 Novembre 1918, 69100 Villeurbanne,
France.</institution>
</institution-wrap>
</aff>
</contrib-group>
<pub-date date-type="pub" publication-format="electronic">
<day>04</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2020</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>2</volume>
<elocation-id>french-librarians-perspective</elocation-id>
<permissions>
<license license-type="CC-BY-SA" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/">
<license-p>Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International
License</license-p>
</license>
</permissions>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://jrn.trialanderror.org/pub/french-librarians-perspective">This pub is available from https://jrn.trialanderror.org/pub/french-librarians-perspective</self-uri>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="abstract">
  <title><bold>Abstract</bold></title>
  <p>Reproducible research requires to dive into a wide range of
  subjects (e.g.: statistics, study design, scientific computing) that
  are quite far from French librarians practices and/or initial
  training. Librarians do have a technical expertise, but horror stories
  pinpoint that even seasoned experts seem to lose track. In such
  context, what could be the added value of librarians?</p>
  <p><bold>Keywords: </bold><italic>librarian, cultural brokerage,
  interdisciplinarity, collaboration</italic></p>
  <graphic id="nx4dbhmnyeb" mimetype="image" mime-subtype="png" xlink:href="https://assets.pubpub.org/42rwrqk3/image-71691157283736.png" />
  <p></p>
  <p></p>
  <graphic id="nrbree3j3bo" mimetype="image" mime-subtype="png" xlink:href="https://assets.pubpub.org/pzrlppew/image-71691160815460.png" />
</sec>
<sec id="references">
  <title><bold>References</bold></title>
  <p>Carbone P, Giami A. Le parcours et la carrière des conservateurs de
  bibliothèques. Paris: Ministère de l’Enseignement Supérieur, de la
  Recherche et de l’Innovation; 2017.</p>
  <p>Smart AG. The war over supercooled water. Phys Today [Internet].
  2018 Aug 22 [cited 2018 Aug 24]; Available from:
  <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://physicstoday.scitation.org/do/10.1063/PT.6.1.20180822a/full/" xlink:title="null">https://physicstoday.scitation.org/do/10.1063/PT.6.1.20180822a/full/</ext-link>
  </p>
  <p>Baker M. 1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility. Nature.
  2016 May 25;533(7604):452–4.</p>
  <p>Committee on Reproducibility and Replicability in Science,
  Committee on National Statistics, Board on Behavioral, Cognitive, and
  Sensory Sciences, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and
  Education, Nuclear and Radiation Studies Board, Division on Earth and
  Life Studies, et al. Reproducibility and Replicability in Science
  [Internet]. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press; 2019 [cited
  2019 Sep 3]. Available from:
  <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.nap.edu/catalog/25303" xlink:title="null">https://www.nap.edu/catalog/25303</ext-link>
  </p>
  <p>Randall D, Welser C. The Irreproducibility Crisis of Modern
  Science. Causes, Consequences, and the Road to Reform [Internet]. New
  York: National Association of Scholars; 2018. Available from:
  <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.nas.org/reports/the-irreproducibility-crisis-of-modern-science" xlink:title="null">https://www.nas.org/reports/the-irreproducibility-crisis-of-modern-science</ext-link>
  </p>
  <p>Benureau F, Rougier N. Re-run, Repeat, Reproduce, Reuse, Replicate:
  Transforming Code into Scientific Contributions. ArXiv170808205 Cs
  [Internet]. 2017 Aug 28 [cited 2017 Sep 25]; Available from:
  http://arxiv.org/abs/1708.08205</p>
  <p>Bearman M, Smith CD, Carbone A, Slade S, Baik C, Hughes-Warrington
  M, et al. Systematic review methodology in higher education. High Educ
  Res Dev. 2012 Oct;31(5):625–40.</p>
  <p>Higgins J, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page M, et al.
  Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions [Internet].
  2 nd ed. Chichester: John Wiley &amp; Sons; 2019. Available from:
  <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/1198759353" xlink:title="null">http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/1198759353</ext-link>
  </p>
  <p>Fanelli D. “Positive” Results Increase Down the Hierarchy of the
  Sciences. Scalas E, editor. PLoS ONE. 2010 Apr 7;5(4):e10068.</p>
  <p>Nieuwland M. Nature says it wants to publish replication attempts.
  So what happened when a group of authors submitted one to Nature
  Neuroscience? Part 1 [ Internet]. Retraction Watch. 2018 [cited 2018
  May 31]. Available from:
  <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://retractionwatch.com/2018/05/08/nature-says-it-wants-to-publish-replication-attempts-so-what-happened-when-a-group-of-authors-submitted-one-to-nature-neuroscience/" xlink:title="null">https://retractionwatch.com/2018/05/08/nature-says-it-wants-to-publish-replication-attempts-so-what-happened-when-a-group-of-authors-submitted-one-to-nature-neuroscience/</ext-link>
  </p>
  <p>Nieuwland M. An attempt to publish a replication attempt in a
  Nature journal, part 2 [Internet]. Retraction Watch. 2018 [ cited 2018
  May 31]. Available from:
  <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://retractionwatch.com/2018/05/09/an-attempt-to-publish-a-replication-attempt-in-a-nature-journal-part-2/" xlink:title="null">https://retractionwatch.com/2018/05/09/an-attempt-to-publish-a-replication-attempt-in-a-nature-journal-part-2/</ext-link>
  </p>
  <p>Nieuwland M. One team’s struggle to publish a replication attempt,
  part 3 [ Internet]. Retraction Watch. 2018 [cited 2018 May 31].
  Available from:
  <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://retractionwatch.com/2018/05/10/one-teams-struggle-to-publish-a-replication-attempt-part-3/" xlink:title="null">https://retractionwatch.com/2018/05/10/one-teams-struggle-to-publish-a-replication-attempt-part-3/</ext-link>
  </p>
  <p>Nosek BA, Beck ED, Campbell L, Flake JK, Hardwicke TE, Mellor DT,
  et al. Preregistration Is Hard, And Worthwhile. Trends Cogn Sci. 2019
  Aug;S1364661319301846.</p>
  <p>Munafò MR, Nosek BA, Bishop DVM, Button KS, Chambers CD, Sert NP
  du, et al. A manifesto for reproducible science. Nat Hum Behav. 2017
  Jan 10;1(1):0021.</p>
  <p>Frankenhuis W, Nettle D. Open Science is Liberating and Can Foster
  Creativity. Open Sci Framew [Internet]. 2018 Feb 18 [cited 2018 May
  31]; Available from:
  <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://osf.io/edhym/" xlink:title="null">https://osf.io/edhym/</ext-link>
  </p>
  <p>Lindsay DS, Simons DJ, Lilienfeld SO. Research Preregistration 101.
  APS Obs [Internet]. 2016 Nov 30 [cited 2018 Jan 12];29(10). Available
  from:
  <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.psychologicalscience.org/observer/research-preregistration-101" xlink:title="null">https://www.psychologicalscience.org/observer/research-preregistration-101</ext-link>
  </p>
  <p>Devezer B, Navarro DJ, Vandekerckhove J, Buzbas EO. The case for
  formal methodology in scientific reform. bioRxiv. 2020 Apr
  28;2020.04.26.048306.</p>
  <p>Lilienfeld SO, Waldman ID, editors. Maximizing the Reproducibility
  of Your Research. Psychol Sci Scrut Recent Chall Propos Solut [
  Internet]. 2014 Feb 26 [cited 2018 Jun 8]; Available from:
  <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://osf.io/xidvw/" xlink:title="null">https://osf.io/xidvw/</ext-link>
  </p>
  <p>Wessel I. Reflections of an open science convert 1: Why I changed
  my research practices [Internet]. Mindwise. 2019 [cited 2020 May 4].
  Available from:
  <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://mindwise-groningen.nl/reflections-of-an-open-science-convert-1/" xlink:title="null">https://mindwise-groningen.nl/reflections-of-an-open-science-convert-1/</ext-link>
  </p>
  <p>Leek J. On the scalability of statistical procedures: why the
  p-value bashers just don’t get it. · Simply Statistics [Internet].
  Simply Statistics. 2014 [cited May 28]. Available from:
  <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://simplystatistics.org/2014/02/14/on-the-scalability-of-statistical-procedures-why-the-p-value-bashers-just-dont-get-it/" xlink:title="null">https://simplystatistics.org/2014/02/14/on-the-scalability-of-statistical-procedures-why-the-p-value-bashers-just-dont-get-it/</ext-link>
  </p>
  <p>Wilcox RR, Rousselet GA. A Guide to Robust Statistical Methods in
  Neuroscience. Curr Protoc Neurosci. 2018 Jan 22;82:8.42.1-8.42.30.</p>
  <p>Plesser HE. Reproducibility vs. Replicability: A Brief History of a
  Confused Terminology. Front Neuroinformatics [Internet]. 2018 [ cited
  2018 Feb 16];11. Available from:
  <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fninf.2017.00076/full" xlink:title="null">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fninf.2017.00076/full</ext-link>
  </p>
  <p>Bammer G. Should we discipline interdisciplinarity? Palgrave
  Commun. 2017 Nov 14;3(1):1–4.</p>
  <p>Brown RR, Deletic A, Wong THF. Interdisciplinarity: How to catalyse
  collaboration. Nat News. 2015 Sep 17;525(7569):315.</p>
  <p>Jang S. Cultural Brokerage and Creative Performance in
  Multicultural Teams. Organ Sci. 2017 Dec 1;28(6):993–1009.</p>
  <p>Yarborough M, Nadon R, Karlin DG. Four erroneous beliefs thwarting
  more trustworthy research. Rodgers P, Pewsey E, MacLeod MR, Michel M,
  Amaral OB, editors. eLife. 2019 Jul 29;8:e45261.</p>
  <p>Leonelli S. Re-Thinking Reproducibility as a Criterion for Research
  Quality. Hist Econ Thought Methodol. 2018 Jan;19.</p>
  <p>Deardorff A. Assessing the impact of introductory programming
  workshops on the computational reproducibility of biomedical
  workflows. bioRxiv. 2020 Mar 9;2020.03.09.983429.</p>
  <p>Barba LA. Terminologies for Reproducible Research. ArXiv180203311
  Cs [Internet]. 2018 Feb 9 [cited Feb 16]; Available from:
  <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://arxiv.org/abs/1802.03311" xlink:title="null">http://arxiv.org/abs/1802.03311</ext-link>
  </p>
  <p>Jang S. Bringing Worlds Together: Cultural Brokerage in
  Multicultural Teams [Internet]. Harvard University; 2014 [cited 2020
  Oct 27]. Available from:
  <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://dash.harvard.edu/handle/1/12274592" xlink:title="null">https://dash.harvard.edu/handle/1/12274592</ext-link>
  </p>
  <p>Kvenild C, Calkins K. Embedded librarians: moving beyond one-shot
  instruction. Chicago: Association of College and Research Libraries;
  2011.</p>
  <p>Orben A, Parsons S, Crüwell S. ReproducibiliTea Starter Pack. 2019
  Feb 7 [cited 2019 Feb 12]; Available from:
  <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://osf.io/3ed8x/" xlink:title="null">https://osf.io/3ed8x/</ext-link>
  </p>
  <p>Whitaker K. 10 simple rules to run an open and inclusive project
  online [Internet]. 2019 Sep 1 [cited 2019 Sep 2]. Available from:
  <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://zenodo.org/record/3383063#.XWzHeoppEfQ" xlink:title="null">https://zenodo.org/record/3383063#.XWzHeoppEfQ</ext-link>
  </p>
  <p>Hettne KM, Proppert R, Nab L, Saunero LPR, Gawehns D. ReprohackNL
  2019: How libraries can promote research reproducibility through
  community engagement [Internet]. SocArXiv; 2020 Apr [cited 2020 Apr
  30]. Available from: https://osf.io/6f4zv</p>
  <p>Boettiger C, Hao Y, Lowndes JSS, Frazier MR. Code Review in the
  Lab, or ... How do you review code that accompanies a research project
  or paper? - rOpenSci - open tools for open science [Internet].
  ROpenSci. 2018 [cited 2020 Apr 8]. Available from:
  https://ropensci.org/commcalls/2018-10-16/</p>
  <p>Lowndes JSS, Best BD, Scarborough C, Afflerbach JC, Frazier MR,
  O’Hara CC, et al. Our path to better science in less time using open
  data science tools. Nat Ecol Evol. 2017 Jun;1(6):0160.</p>
  <p>Lowndes JSS. R for better science in less time [Internet]. UseR
  2019; 2019 Jul 10 [cited 2019 Jul 10]; Toulouse. Available from:
  <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://jules32.github.io/useR-2019-keynote/#1" xlink:title="null">https://jules32.github.io/useR-2019-keynote/#1</ext-link>
  </p>
  <p>Baker R, Berry D, Brokering M, Dieter M, French A, Rühling B. On
  Book Sprints [Internet]. Berlin: Booksprints.net; 2014. Available
  from:
  <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.booksprints.net/en/blog/book-sprint-on-book-sprints/" xlink:title="null">https://www.booksprints.net/en/blog/book-sprint-on-book-sprints/</ext-link>
  </p>
  <p>Pope C. The Great Sussex Book Sprint [Internet]. Dr Catherine Pope.
  2017 [cited 2018 Jul 12]. Available from:
  <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://catherinepope.com/great-sussex-book-sprint/" xlink:title="null">https://catherinepope.com/great-sussex-book-sprint/</ext-link>
  </p>
  <p>Baker R. Book Sprints for ICT Research - Testing the practice of
  Book Sprints as a new paradigm of collaborative writing for ICT
  researchers and innovators (project evaluative research report)
  [Internet]. Floss Manuals Foundation; 2014 [cited Jun 18]. Available
  from: https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/323988</p>
  <p>Heller L, Brinken H. How to run a book sprint – in 16 steps
  [Internet]. Impact of Social Sciences. 2018 [cited 2018 Dec 12].
  Available from:
  <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2018/11/20/how-to-run-a-book-sprint-in-16-steps/" xlink:title="null">http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2018/11/20/how-to-run-a-book-sprint-in-16-steps/</ext-link>
  </p>
  <p>TIB. FOSTER Book Sprint at TIB [Internet]. [cited Jun 18].
  Available from: https://www.tib.eu/en/service/events/details/foster-bo
  ok-sprint-at-tib/ </p>
  <p>Desquilbet L, Granger S, Hejblum B, Legrand A, Pernot P, Rougier
  NP. Vers une recherche reproductible [Internet]. ebook. Bordeaux:
  Urfist de Bordeaux; 2019 [cited 2019 May 6]. Available from:
  <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02144142" xlink:title="null">https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02144142</ext-link>
  </p>
  <p>Becher T, Trowler PR. Academic tribes and territories: intellectual
  enquiry and the culture of disciplines. Buckingham, Royaume-Uni de
  Grande-Bretagne et d’Irlande du Nord: Open university press, 2001;
  2001. xv+238.</p>
  <p>Varoquaux G. Technical discussions are hard; a few tips [Internet].
  Gael-Varoquaux.info. 2020 [cited 2020 May 28]. Available from:
  <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://gael-varoquaux.info/programming/technical-discussions-are-hard-a-few-tips.html" xlink:title="null">http://gael-varoquaux.info/programming/technical-discussions-are-hard-a-few-tips.html</ext-link>
  </p>
  <p>Herterich P, Solymosi R, Perez-Suarez D, Brown L, Frawley J. Are
  you promoting good practices for open research? [Internet]. Software
  Sustainability Institute. 2020 [cited 2020 May 20]. Available from:
  <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://software.ac.uk/blog/2020-05-20-cw20-speed-blog-are-you-promoting-good-practices-open-research" xlink:title="null">https://software.ac.uk/blog/2020-05-20-cw20-speed-blog-are-you-promoting-good-practices-open-research</ext-link>
  </p>
  <p>Bishop DVM. Fallibility in Science: Responding to Errors in the
  Work of Oneself and Others: Adv Methods Pract Psychol Sci [Internet].
  2018 Jul 3 [cited 2018 Jul 4]; Available from:
  <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/2515245918776632?journalCode=ampa#articleShareContainer" xlink:title="null">http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/2515245918776632?journalCode=ampa#articleShareContainer</ext-link>
  </p>
  <p>Parker H. Opinionated analysis development. PeerJ Prepr [Internet].
  2017 Aug 31 [cited 2018 Feb 16]; Available from:
  <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.3210v1" xlink:title="null">https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.3210v1</ext-link>
  </p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
</back>
</article>